Previous: Hopper watercolors (6)

Next: Hopper people (13)

Hopper architecture

Post #1007 • May 23, 2007, 1:15 PM • 4 Comments

Visualize along with me: today, have a look at some straight ahead architectural works by Hopper. Tomorrow, I'll post the figure in interior works, and I want you to ask yourself whether the figures feel added into the architecture, or whether they've been worked into the whole cloth of the painting. I'm forming a thesis, likely incorrect, that some of the figures seem awkward not becuase (or not only because) of the usual complaints about their anatomy, but because they don't strictly need to be there from a formal standpoint.

It's probaly heresy to suggest it, but I generally find figural works by Corot to come off awkwardly, especially when compared to the bullseye certainty of his straight landscapes. That doesn't always make his landscapes superior, but I notice the tension - I get the sense that he could have painted little views of Rome all day with great pleasure, while his renditions of women, however loving, were at least somewhat of a pain in the neck for him. I'm going to suggest that the same was the case for Hopper - that he would rather be painting urban landscapes, but if any human drama was going to unfold inside the interiors, there had to be some goddamn humans in the picture.

In the meantime, these just coalesce like a good jazz ballad.

Edward Hopper: Early Sunday Morning, 1930, oil on canvas, Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, purchase, with funds from Gertrude Vanderbilt Whitney, courtesy of the Whitney Museum of American Art: Photographs by Steven Sloman, courtesy, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

Edward Hopper: Captain Upton's House, 1927, oil on canvas, collection of Steve Martin, courtesy, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

Edward Hopper: Hills, South Truro, 1930, oil on canvas, The Cleveland Museum of Art, Hinman B. Hurlbut Collection, © The Cleveland Museum of Art, courtesy, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

I lightly homaged Early Sunday Morning. Well, the hydrant.

Comment

1.

Arthur Whitman

May 23, 2007, 3:32 PM

The hydrant and barbershop pole in Early Sunday Morning feel decidedly anthropomorphic, and yes, less than necessary as well (although it would be good to have something in foreground).

2.

dont u think?

May 23, 2007, 5:24 PM

"Organic Chemistry" lacks nuance.
Nuance abounds in Hopper & Corot.

3.

Franklin

May 23, 2007, 5:34 PM

Totally agree.

4.

opie

May 24, 2007, 10:56 AM

Interesting that you say that, Arthur. I has seen the painting a couple of times but this time I realized how vital the fire hydrant and the barber pole are to the picture. Anthropomorphic, yes - virtually figurative, in fact. Without them the painting would be dead. This one of those rare things that you just can't see in reproduction.

Subscribe

Twitter @franklin_e

Instagram franklin.e

Offers

Other Projects

Legal

Design and content ©2003-2017 Franklin Einspruch except where otherwise noted